"I imagine that someone looked at a beautiful man or woman thinking it would if the prostitute? Something happens to many rulers when they look at their own territories and only think about withdrawing euro at the expense of her beauty but this will destroy.
Paco Caceres
The siege of the Hazard oak or destruction of trees in different municipalities, direct mail advertising de la Vega, not isolated events, are one among several signs that define the dominant model governing territory of the English geography. Two salient features of this model, the land is seen as a commodity and urban projects are above any consideration of environmental, cultural or historical.
The ease with which the municipal governments of different political colors (not just PP and Granada is the capital) felled trees indicates that they have the same status as a lamppost and a tree, both are part of urban furniture that can be dispensed without a second thought whether to remodel a street or square. Seen this way, the tree loses the category of being alive, your opportunity to be part of the natural heritage of the municipalities and, of course, being a sign of identity that has grown with residents (past and / or present and future) Village to be part of their history.
It's not just the trees and removable elements. We have the sad experience that the appearance of archaeological remains in some municipalities have been classified by their own elected officials as simply irrelevant sites simply because they posed an impediment to the development of the planned works. At this point we might recall the destruction, carried out in some municipalities, homes and places of significant architectural value for blocks of flats. This way of seeing the territory strips people of their history, their culture, past and future in a frozen present a "live for today", to which we must make the most money possible performance.
And if we leave the village, overlooking the like, the Vega is only a green environment that contribute million euros if it is urbanized, the riverside is the ideal location to build a road and a hill overlooking the opportunity of gold to build a housing for the rich that will reap dividends for developers and a few crumbs for the council.
In this realm of easy money, everything is for sale, landscape, water, rivers, even the air we breathe. Can you imagine that someone looked at a beautiful man or woman what he would think if the prostitute? Something happens to many rulers when they look at their own territories and only think about withdrawing euro at the expense of her beauty but this will destroy. In this light, divide the territory as we say in need of Vega, a useful part of the developable, which gives money, and the municipalities that fiercely defend their competition, supported by the manufacturers. And the land useless, you can not sell and which do not even want to hear about, are the rivers, roads and protected areas. That philosophy as Phoenician (buying and selling) gives many more mayors gentry status of a farmhouse hustlers to sell some goods and waste managers that the integral of a people. At the end pays the duck is the territory and future individuals who will suffer the consequences of this destructive policy.
No, not just the siege of a solitary oak, however important it is, what is under this framework. There's more. There is a model that bases its survival on the prostitution of the territory and to kill the "grandfathers" (past, history, culture) and grandchildren (future). What do citizens? Well, that will be subject of another article.
0 comments:
Post a Comment